Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice
Research Papers

Research Papers

Share and discuss quantum computing research

last post 3h ago by aqora_bot
Aqora Botaqora_bot

1

Posted 7h ago

Optimal inequalities for completely bounded polynomials and the limitations of quantum query algorithms

External link
Francisco Escudero Gutiérrez, Miquel Saucedo, Carlos Palazuelos (Sep 07 2026).
Abstract: We consider the problem of establishing limitations on the power of quantum query algorithms via the completely bounded polynomial method. In particular, we prove several optimal functional inequalities involving different notions of completely bounded polynomials. These inequalities lead to limiting theorems for the power of quantum query algorithms that improve on prior works. 1. An optimal root-influence bound for block-multilinear polynomials. Prior work showed that block-multilinear polynomials ppp of degree ttt satisfy a root-influence bound, ∥p∥cb≥∑iInfi[p]/t2\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\geq \sum_i \sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}/t^2∥p∥cb​≥∑i​Infi​[p]​/t2, which is stronger than the bound appearing in the Aaronson-Ambainis conjecture. We find the optimal constant in that inequality: ∥p∥cb≥∑iInfi[p]/t\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\geq \sum_i \sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}/t∥p∥cb​≥∑i​Infi​[p]​/t. Since the amplitudes of quantum algorithms that query disjoint blocks of inputs-such as ttt-fold forrelation- are block-multilinear polynomials with ∥p∥cb≤1,\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\leq 1,∥p∥cb​≤1, our inequality shows that they satisfy t≥∑iInfi[p]t\geq \sum_i\sqrt{\mathrm{Inf}_i[p]}t≥∑i​Infi​[p]​. We prove that this inequality yields both a more efficient classical simulation than prior results based on the Aaronson-Ambainis argument, and a qualitative improvement: all classical queries are nonadaptive. 2. Optimal Fourier growth of the highest level of quantum query algorithms. We show that for every polynomial ppp defined on {−1,1}n\{-1,1\}^n{−1,1}n of degree 2t2t2t, the Fourier Growth at the level 2t,2t,2t, namely ∥p^2t∥ℓ1\|\widehat p_{2t}\|_{\ell_1}∥p​2t​∥ℓ1​​, satisfies ∥p^2t∥ℓ1≤(en/(2t−1))2t−12∥p∥cb\|\widehat p_{2t}\|_{\ell_1}\leq (en/(2t-1))^{\frac{2t-1}{2}}\|p\|_{\text{cb}}∥p​2t​∥ℓ1​​≤(en/(2t−1))22t−1​∥p∥cb​. This is optimal up to the factor eee, as witnessed by 2t2t2t-fold forrelation. As quantum query algorithms that make ttt queries (to the whole input) satisfy ∥p∥cb≤1\|p\|_{\text{cb}}\leq 1∥p∥cb​≤1, this yields a Fourier growth bound for these algorithms, partially resolving a question by Girish (STOC, 2026).
Arxiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05201

Order by:

Want to join this discussion?

Join our community today and start discussing with our members by participating in exciting events, competitions, and challenges. Sign up now to engage with quantum experts!

LoginSign up